We cannot rest in the drive to #DefendBlackLives in Culver City. The current uprising has changed what’s possible. Right now is a critical opportunity to transform Culver City’s approach to policing and public safety. The City Council meets tonight, Monday, June 15, 7pm, to respond to the crisis. Among other things, the police budget is on the agenda, with just one week to go before the budget is finalized. Please show up and speak out to make change.
CCAN has issued two core demands to the Council in advance of this Monday’s meeting:
- Start to #DefundPoice by shrinking CCPD’s budget. We propose an additional 17%, $7.65 million reduction beyond the current proposed budget, with the funds to be reallocated to meeting community needs in ways outside the PD’s control.
- Establish community control by including policing squarely within the General Plan Update process, subjecting it to oversight by a robust, independent commission with jurisdiction over public safety, and requiring immediate PD implementation of the California Racial & Identity Profiling Act.
Public pressure is essential. Here are two things you can do right away:
- Speak out at tonight’s 7pm Council meeting. New voices are the most influential because they demonstrate that things are changing. You can also submit written comments to be read at the meeting. Details on the mechanics are at this link.
- Urge your friends, family, and neighbors to speak out, too.
Let’s all seize this opportunity to make real change.
June 13, 2020
Dear City Council of Culver City:
Thank you for creating the space in your Monday, June 15 special meeting to address how to #DefendBlackLives in Culver City. Echoing calls from Black-led groups like the Movement for Black Lives, we have two fundamental demands: #DefundPolice and assert community control. The funding issue is most urgent, given the current budget process, while the second can be set in motion now but will require, and can allow, more time. These are demands for structural change in the function and governance of policing in Culver City.
You have a crucial opportunity to listen to voices that have long been ignored by most City leaders. These are the voices of Black and other people of color who have testified, again and again, to experiences of racial profiling and police harassment, to fear of harm at the hands of police, to a continuing sense of exclusion and disrespect. Our City has never confronted, let alone overcome, the legacy of racism that stretches from a whites-only founding through official support for racially exclusive covenants to operation as a sundown town enforced by the PD to the hiring of one of Rodney King’s police attackers to today’s gross racial disparities in who bears the brunt of policing.
We reject the repeated pattern in which the response to such points is not just a refusal to listen and acknowledge but also a turn to unflinching, unqualified support for the CCPD exactly as it is, and to self-congratulatory exceptionalism that insists that none of the problems that pervade policing in our country apply here, despite the ample evidence to the contrary. Similarly, while we applaud diversity among CCPD personnel, the notion, repeatedly invoked, that such diversity immunizes the PD against any problems of racially biased policing, and in particular any issues of anti-Blackness, reflects a fundamental confusion about the nature of structural racism. Unfortunately, even in the midst of the current uprising, statements from the Police Chief and from several former Mayors have continued the old patterns. It is not enough to acknowledge the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis and then pivot to a celebration of the status quo in Culver City. To the contrary, it is further proof of the deep need for immediate, decisive structural change.
More specifically, we call on the Council to1) #DefundPolice: In this budget cycle, the City Council should remove at least an additional $7.65 million from the currently proposed $45 million CCPD budget and reallocate these funds to meeting community needs in ways outside PD control.
Such a reallocation would do two things: First, $5.65 million would reverse the proposed budget’s current insulation of the PD from the brunt of the planned 17.4% cut in General Fund appropriations brought on by the pandemic fiscal crisis; this would bring the PD cuts into parity with the overall budget. Second, an additional $2 million would reduce PD funding by a further 5%, modestly shrinking its overall budget share. Even so, the PD would still receive 31% of General Fund appropriations, far more than any department. This total PD budget of $37.3 million would remain $4 million above its $33 million inflation-adjusted level of ten years ago. In other words, our proposed minimum change would roll back some, but not all, of the growth in police spending over the last decade. Much more will be needed after this budget cycle.
These reductions should include both reallocation of some existing unsworn operations to other departments and also cutbacks in reliance on sworn officers for functions better performed outside the rubric of law enforcement. San Francisco just decided to shift its police away from front-line response to calls about mental health, unhoused people, school discipline and neighbor disputes. Culver City currently has an officer-to-population ratio more than 50% larger than the national average for similarly sized cities and also than neighboring cities, except Beverly Hills.
Possible destinations for new investment with these dollars include fully funding the City’s recently adopted My Brother’s Keeper action plan (except those components operated through the PD), expanding the City’s currently paltry $1 million budget for senior & other social services through PRCS, and assisting CCUSD in closing its projected $6 million 2020-21 budget deficit.
2) Establish community control: We reiterate our prior demands that the City commit to reimagining its approach to public safety through the General Plan process and by establishing a robust, independent commission with jurisdiction over the CCPD and public safety more broadly. In both cases, it is essential to get away from thinking of policing problems primarily as matters of individualized discipline of “bad apples.” Instead, we must think about approaches to public safety that do not rely on law enforcement and about how policing itself can endanger public safety. Good information is essential to good oversight, and so we also call for the Council to direct the PD to immediately implement the reporting standards of the California Racial & Identity Profiling Act, something it thus far has been delaying as long as legally possible.
We urge you to respond boldly to this moment of crisis by enacting structural changes that break sharply from the old patterns that brought us to this point, both as a country and as a city.
Culver City Action Network (CCAN
Thanks to the efforts of CCAN, the Culver City Police Department has adopted a robust immigration policy that adheres to our Sanctuary City status. The policy was negotiated by CCAN, CCPD, and the City of Culver City. You can read the policy below:
Hoy se cumple un año de que el Consejo de Culver City pasara la resolución Ciudad Santuario. Culver City Action Network (CCAN), dirigió la compañía para el santuario y ha presionado para que se implemente de lleno. Esto incluye la ayuda que brindamos para rechazar la reciente propuesta de la policía, de comprar lectores de placa automáticos a un comerciante privado que colabora con las fuerzas federales de inmigración.
Hay mucho que hacer todavía y CCAN ha desarrollado una propuesta; Santuario 2.0 para marcar un camino hacia adelante. Esta propuesta se construye en base a lo que aprendimos el año pasado, que se resume en nuestra tarjeta de reporte de santuario.
Estamos agradecidos de que los candidatos al Consejo de Culver City, Alex Fish y Daniel Lee, han declarado su apoyo al Santuario 2.0. Damos la bienvenida al apoyo de todos los candidatos y de la comunidad. Esperamos trabajar con el siguiente consejo para hacer todo lo que está en nuestro poder para apoyar a los inmigrantes de nuestra comunidad y para evitar ponerlos en peligro de los crueles ataques de la administración de Trump.
Today marks the one-year anniversary of the Culver City Council’s passage of a Sanctuary City resolution. Culver City Action Network (CCAN) led the campaign for sanctuary and has pressed for full implementation since then. This includes helping to defeat the CCPD’s recent proposal for an automated- license-plate reader contract with a private vendor that collaborates with federal immigration enforcers.
There is much more work to do, and CCAN has developed a Sanctuary 2.0 proposal to chart a path forward. This proposal builds on what we have learned this past year, which we summarize in our Sanctuary Report Card.
We are grateful that City Council candidates Alex Fisch and Daniel Lee have declared their support for Sanctuary 2.0. We welcome support from all candidates and from throughout the community. We look forward to working with the next Council to do everything in our power to support immigrants in our community, and to avoid endangering them in this time of vicious attacks from the Trump Administration.
Proud that Culver City declared itself a sanctuary city in March 2017? Curious how that’s gone in practice? Interested in where to go next? Check out our just-released report & proposal “Sanctuary One Year In: A Culver City Report Card” (web version here, full report in PDF here). Included is our vision for Sanctuary 2.0. One immediate test is for the City Council to reject the Culver City Police Department’s pending proposal for an Automated License Plate Reader system using a vendor that shares its data with ICE. Learn more here!